Sunday, January 10, 2016

intro

 
The two most popular questions I get asked when I talk about my research are 1) “What is the application?” Which means, “is that really worth your time and effort” (and taxpayer money because I am often funded by federal grants), and 2) “How did you get interested in that?” The second question is easier to answer so let’s start with that. I have always been interested in Biology; from ages 7-18 it was marine biology. I had glass shelves around the perimeter of my room with sand and shells setup to look like a beach. There were images of fish on the walls and various marine inspired knick-knacks I accumulated from birthdays and Christmases. When I went to UC Santa Cruz for undergrad I planned to major in marine biology. During my first meeting with my academic advisor, Richard something or other, he recommended I start with a major in general biology and add a marine biology emphasis later if I was still interested. I never added it. My junior year at UCSC I went abroad to Costa Rica for a tropical ecology program. Upon arrival I was asked what my main interest was. Was it plants? Was it reptiles? Amphibians? Birds? You know, what is it that I liked to study? I didn’t want to say marine biology because the program was primarily terrestrial-based so I stole an interest from a good friend of mine and said I liked to study insects. For the rest of my time in Costa Rica my interest in insects grew and gradually narrowed to beetles. After graduation, and a stint in the biotech industry, I started a graduate program at the University of Connecticut and became a specialist on the evolution of beetle genitalia. Hence, the second question, what is the application of my research?

The objects of my affection: male (left) and female (right) genitalia of scarab beetle species (genus Phyllophaga)
In the face of the many catastrophes happening around the world, what is the significance of studying beetle genitalia? This is a good question, there have been many times when I asked myself the same thing. Why don’t I put my intelligence, experience, and enthusiasm toward something more applied? A research program that directly benefits society, such as the influence of climate change on mountain pine beetle infestations. At times I think about it so much I even consider changing my career path and research focus. What I have decided to do instead is start this blog. To answer the question of applicability by showing how seemingly superfluous research creates the foundation for discoveries - discoveries that provide sustainable options to keep up with the demands of human society. Every organism with a role in bio-inspiration was discovered, named, and described by taxonomists. The habits, distribution, natural history, and reproductive behavior of each of those species were studied intensively by a second group of scientists. And the potential of that species to provide a solution to human-based issues is often recognized by yet another set of scientists. Most times, such discoveries are based on research conducted by several different types of scientists over hundreds of years. Each discovery represents a synergy of ideas from a long history of curious people dedicated to learning more. These are their stories, with a few of my own curiosities mixed in. And the result, well, I like to think of it as an account of our GDC (Gross Domestic Curiosity).
 
“If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.” Isaac Newton (1676), by way of Bernard of Chartres (1130) through John of Salisbury (1159).

1 comment:

  1. Maxi, This is a fantastic idea. Compiling good examples of the intersections of basic and applied science will help us all. I look forward to following. In any case, never doubt that you're doing something useful, if no moreso than inspiring others to love nature. That's ultimately more critical than specific discoveries.

    ReplyDelete